RAMADAN

     "Beggars can't chose - givers can -

is CHARITY  then the giving of what beggars can't chose to refuse" 

    

To give, 'donate' stuff cluttering up one's life & space, (trash) to others one imagine might welcome them with open-arms due to their marginalized social or economic situations, then gleefully congratulate one's generosity as charity; is self delusional, misplaced,  flawed ! Not NOBLE

Very few practice charity with complete altruism. Other than Love being the nature of God  few by the very nature of being human can do true charity or practice Love - i.e make sacrifices; loving another (especially a completely unrelated person) without  expectations whatsoever of self gain. 

At all if one wishes to be a convicted doer of charity, one has need to first kill self!  

First to subdue instinctive impulses for ego affirmation, 

for self-satisfaction 

for gratification in the giving of oneself !

In killing expectations for benefits, gains, material or imagined; one might then (perhaps) come closer to the practice of true loving.

"A Lover is utterly selfless - has no regards other than to give all to the Loved.

Do we really Love anyone?

Happy Ramadan...

One Man's GOOD is another Man's...

                       Why do some people dislike others who essentially do “good” things? 
   Why is there intolerance and hatred for  good people.? 
   Generally such folks have in them the unresolved vice of ENVY. 
   This is often the case.
Of course one brush cannot tar all.  
  Not being a certified practitioner of Psychology, it is only an impression of people & of life.
  Has anyone who is generally well liked, with a pleasant disposition, and a helpful attitude not attract a huge “fan” base of detractors?
Popular students tend to draw many who would love them “dead”! Teacher’s pets are the most hated in the class.

 Great statesmen and leaders who generally have the welfare of the people at heart, who go to extremes to make life better for others, who sacrifice almost all for their constituents or country, these are the ones who do most good, and these are the ones who are generally done in prematurely.   Julius Caesar? Mahatma Gandhi? Abraham Lincoln? JFK? Robert Kennedy? Martin Luther King? John Lennon ?
These with their idealistic philosophy, led. 
Not necessarily advocating a materialistically better life, or one which has greater domination over others, or a life where one need do no work but just sit back and indulge in sensual hedonism. Rather they almost to an individual advocate “LOVE”, “JUSTICE” “EQUALITY” “FREEDOM”,”TRUTH” and simply
            “LOVE”
 which basically is to 
         SHARE the FARE 
here provided by HIM for ALL 
           - FAIRly -
 LOVE as well as many noble traits are not to be regarded as values mal-represented & poorly portrayed by so many romance novels, Hollywood flicks, and TV serials, especially as mis-advocated by some RELIGIONists !

 LOVE being the sacrifice of oneself for others who are not exactly of one's own.  
J Christ {supposedly} died giving that LOVE for unknown others: if gospel were TRUE - 
THAT act  was turned into the biggest circus act this side of the Sun.
   Why does one have dislike for certain movements or Institutions and other online organizations so obviously advocating LOVE, TRUTH, PEACE, JUSTICE, GOOD, HONESTY as well as real life people too who live out such values everyday as a norm?
Is it because of a different idea of what these values represent to us?
And without doubt - from: °°"Truth" what is that" would by progression arrive at °°°"LOVE" - Wtf is THAT?"

They say if one loses the Gift of Humor one is OLD i.e as good as living dead.

If one loses that gift of LOVE, the ability to feel it and give it - ONE is indeed as DEAD as DEATH itself.

And obviously from that salient point, if one feels 'very strong dislike' for 'good' then one is well on the road to losing the ability to LOVE & one would thus be as dead as a door-"nail" sooner than one can say       
             "SKREW"

Did we do RIGHT ...

In Whose name do we commit these "GOOD"

If one imagines the 'GOOD' committed in HIS name ever is at all in line with what HIS WILL for Man was, it might be perhaps pertinent that one reflect on whether one even 

has an inkling of HIS WILL ; being THAT far removed as it were in every essential quality of GODliness as a created creature; much as we love to rejoice in our delusional claim of being made in HIS image.