If the mountain won't come to Obasamad..

     
    
        At a quiz when the question was posed to complete the saying:

“ ..if the MOUNTAIN won’t come to Obasamad..”
 
 received the answer: 


“..Obasamad will not go to the MOUNTAIN too.
    

    ”
The correct answer would be :

”..if the MOUNTAIN won’t come to Obasamad,
 Obasamad will go to the MOUNTAIN..”      

                         
obviously


      HOI!!
 He is the MOUNTAIN, the SUPREMO, the MAN, the CREATOR,  the BOSS. 

 
°For the MOUNTAIN to come to Obasamad is akin to the SUPREMO descending from on high to stoop to the level of that slime inhabitant Obasamad.
 
[AND some faith groups do claim HE made that downward leap into SlimeDom]
 
°For Obasamad opting NOT to go to the MOUNTAIN as answered indicates the contemporary attitude of - 

“..hey, who the Få®K do you think you are that I [though a SlimeDom inhabitant] should condescend to APPROACH you, even if you were THE MOUNTAIN..”?
  
 
       This very contemporary, very glaring attitude of complete ARROGANCE of the nonentity, the creature; begs the query of how an OMNISCIENT Persona had obviously ‘short changed’ HIS handiwork, so claimed made in HIS ''image'' (hence god-like?)
                
- omitting to embed that critical personality trait of HUMILITY, to be originally be aware and acknowledge personal zero-ness when held up to the  divine PURITY, the EXCELLENCE of the SUPREMO?

  
Surely in almost every artifact ever excavated from Historical geological layers, every transmission ever recovered from HIM never had there been indications of DIVINE magnanimity; 
of allowing disobedience; 
tolerating snootiness;
and of
overlooking, allowing obvious disrespect for HIM.
   
Hence if the 'created' 'Man' 
    - despite having been spiritually mis-labelled, inaccurately, presumptiously as having been made in God's 'image'
    but is factually as ''creature'' as ''beast''

  

 as

   

  |||| 

> a Horse <

> a Dog <

> a Cat <

> a Bug <

> a Worm <

> a Monkey <

> a Bird <

> a Cock <

> a Pig <

> a Snake <

> a Buffalo <

> a Hare <

> a Rat <

> a Tiger <

> a Fly <

 - NOT having been embedded that character of spiritual HUMILITY, thus not cognizant of it’s own zero spiritual insignificance and its "dusty" low life origin; 
how then from the 'slime' it now inhabits would HOMO Ss - [pronounce ''Homo Asses''] 
Man, ever be successful, in returning as  'son'  back to HIS divine embrace?
 
Prodigal or no is another non event..
Created in the '''IMAGE''' of GOD is a digression waiting to be digressed

















$împlé $îmÒñ
circa: 00o0








Moi Gnan Thai [See no Evil]

    

    There are numerous very right set folks who hesitate to take life, especially of “cute” puppies and kittens.

    And when the un-neutered bitch or tabby cat in heat gets “filled” with pup & kitten seeds - the resulting hapless, too adorable to be put down Canine/Feline 'issues' which were expected, foreseeable yet not made contingencies for -
these ‘lifes’ due perhaps to some sense of religious & philosophical aversion to overtly take a ‘life’ are taken & placed [dumped is rather more precise] in a market or food places so these abandoned creatures do not die by the hand of the “dumpster” ; has 'food' & will not "DIE"
    The perpetrator goes home happy - no one kill/took any creatures ‘life’
 
What follows can be envisioned as living HELL for these dogs and cats which had their lives spared -
If one can imagine; try picture dogs and cats foraging for food in trash cans in deplorably filthy dumpster, stinking containers, licking water from sewage, drains and cesspool; sheltering from the elements under parked vehicles, getting maimed when vehicles move off too fast, getting kicked & abused by patrons of markets and food places who do not tolerate/like such scenarios.
BUT their lives were spared. The animals were not KILLED
Would death not be better ? 
BETTER to be living in HELL ? 
Alive, yet unwanted, suffering every imaginable tortures of a homeless abandoned non resourced creature?
 
Some claim animals has no soul hence they don't have a HEAVEN or HELL

The responsibility of giving due AND correct respect to 'life' 
NOT to engage an animal as a free security service 
or 
an emotions-enhancing pet 


              then doing the next worse thing to taking a ‘life’



                   PLACING 'life' in LIVING HELL.